From assistive technology to sovereign AI: responsibility, control and transparency as success factors for companies
AI is evolving from a supporting technology to a business-critical component of decisions, processes and systems. This increases responsibility: companies must ensure that AI works in a transparent, fair, secure and regulatory-compliant manner.
AI governance creates the structural, organisational and technical framework conditions to make AI controllable and auditable throughout its entire life cycle. AI sovereignty goes even further: it addresses independence from third-party technologies, data control, open standards and the ability to operate AI systems strategically, transparently and in line with European values.
We support companies in building a responsible, secure and sovereign AI landscape, with clear processes, modern tools, open platforms and a focus on transparency instead of black boxes.
Your contact
Dimensions of a sovereign AI organisation
Governance begins with clear strategic principles: What are the goals of AI in the company? What risks are acceptable? And what regulatory requirements must be met (EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001, GDPR)?
We develop AI guidelines, decision-making principles and approval processes that take into account both technological requirements and ethical and social aspects. This creates a consistent framework for all future AI initiatives. Transparent, verifiable and aligned with the corporate strategy.
To keep AI controllable, defined roles are required — from Model Owner to Risk Officer to Governance Council. These roles take responsibility for fairness, security, transparency, monitoring, and approvals at every stage gate.
We establish clear responsibilities, audit mechanisms, and escalation paths. This ensures that AI systems are not created in isolation but are controlled, documented, and operated in line with organizational objectives.
Companies must know whether they are working with high-risk systems, because the EU AI Act includes extensive obligations for documentation, risk assessment, XAI, bias mitigation, and monitoring.
We develop risk frameworks that systematically evaluate whether a system is “high-risk,” which measures must be applied, and how responsibilities are operationalized according to ISO 42001. As a result, a reliable AI management system is created that withstands audits, inspections, and regulatory reporting.
Explainability is a core component of sovereign AI. XAI makes it possible to make decisions traceable, identify bias, and technically implement regulatory requirements.
We integrate methods such as SHAP, LIME, disparate impact, fairness metrics, and adversarial robustness testing into the software delivery process. This reduces black-box risks and enables users, business stakeholders, and regulators to understand why a model arrives at a decision. Transparency builds trust.
Data is the foundation of any AI. Companies must know where data is stored, who has access, how it is processed, and whether all steps comply with GDPR.
We support the creation of sovereign data spaces, the use of European cloud infrastructures, and the introduction of controlled data-processing procedures. Open interfaces and standards ensure interoperability and prevent data from being locked into proprietary environments.
Technological dependencies on proprietary AI systems pose risks for transparency, costs, compliance, and further development.
We promote the use of open frameworks, support open-source licensing, and build architectures that enable vendor independence. This gives companies freedom in technology decisions, cost transparency, and access to a global innovation community.
Cloud sovereignty means freedom of choice: companies should be able to decide for themselves whether AI is run on hyperscaler platforms or on-premises — without technical or legal dependencies.
We develop hyperscaler-agnostic deployment strategies (e.g., Kubernetes, Terraform, portable container stacks) and create platforms that can run AI anywhere. The infrastructure grows with requirements — flexible, independent, and secure.
Without reproducible processes, model versioning, logging, and drift detection, AI loses its controllability.
We implement MLOps processes that ensure auditability and traceability from training to deployment and monitoring. Through explainable AI and fairness checks, compliance and governance requirements are integrated directly into the lifecycle. This ensures that AI remains controllable continuously, not just once during validation.
Sovereign AI requires not just technology but also people who understand it and use it responsibly.
We develop enablement programs for business units, establish ethics boards, promote transparency in communication, and anchor governance within the organizational culture. Responsible AI emerges only when technology, processes, and people work together.
Sovereignty does not arise in isolation: European AI initiatives such as Gaia-X, European data spaces, or open-source ecosystems strengthen independence and innovation.
We advise on suitable partners, standards, and initiatives and help embed AI infrastructures into larger ecosystems. This ensures AI is designed to be future-proof, interoperable, and sustainable.